Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Z Flip's 88.5 global score. Galaxy A90 5G is a somewhat thicker and heavier phone than Galaxy Z Flip. Galaxy A90 5G has Android operating system, while Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12 operating system. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a just a little better number of pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A90 5G features a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A90 5G features improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.