Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-02-14 | -- |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3080 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 500 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 69.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, with a score of 88.5 against 81.5. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version while Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has Android 13. The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2636, a little smaller display and a quite inferior count of pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a way better performance than Galaxy S23 Ultra. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy Z Flip has a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because it has more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S23 Ultra has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52 percent greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy S23 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a lot higher 200 MP resolution camera, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures and a larger aperture to capture better low light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.