Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, getting an 88.5 score against 85.5. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip construction is newer and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1's, but it's also a little bit heavier. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little inferior number of pixels per display inch, a little smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2246px.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Pocophone F1. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1's camera is just as good as the camera in Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited environments, they both have a same size sensor, the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same resolution back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Pocophone F1. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.