Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than Google Nexus 6P, having a 94.6 score against 80.3. Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is incredibly heavier than the Google Nexus 6P, it's a little thinner and also newer. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a little better processing power than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 9 GB more RAM.
Google Nexus 6P counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little lower 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a greater pixels amount per inch in the display. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because it has more internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has better battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor and a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Nexus 6P, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Nexus 6P. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Google Nexus 6P, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.