Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Google Pixel XL, having a 94.6 score against 81.3. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is incredibly newer and notably thinner, but also incredibly heavier than Google Pixel XL. The Google Pixel XL has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a way smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has more internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a better performing CPU than Google Pixel XL, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a back-facing camera with lesser MP, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos and a larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and videos.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with improved battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 30 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 costs a lot more than the Google Pixel XL, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.