Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than LG V20, getting a general score of 94.6 against 77. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is extremely newer and just a bit thinner, but incredibly heavier than the LG V20. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior CPU than LG V20, because it has more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V20 features a little bit better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite lower 1440 x 2560px resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density. The LG V20 has a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior battery duration than LG V20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes a bit better photographs and videos than LG V20, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a lot larger sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V20. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the LG V20, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.