Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is a lot better than Motorola Droid Turbo's overall score of 76.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is noticeably heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo, it's noticeably thinner and noticeably newer. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with 9 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores (and faster). Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a way better screen density.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a little better battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 15 percent larger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a way worse 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you want to save some money, you can buy Motorola Droid Turbo, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.