Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than Moto G Stylus, having a 94.6 score against 79.7. Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Moto G Stylus were released only 5 months apart, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is notably thinner but notably heavier. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly better looking display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little lower display density, it also counts with a higher 1768 x 2208 resolution and a bigger display.
Moto G Stylus counts with a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little faster CPU than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a little bit longer battery life than Moto G Stylus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Moto G Stylus has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back and a bigger aperture.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G Stylus. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto G Stylus, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.