Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is better than the Moto Z4's 79.8 general score. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is newer and just a little thinner, but also much heavier than the Moto Z4. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while Moto Z4 has Android 10, so it provides a lot of extra features.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display and a better 1768 x 2208 resolution. Moto Z4 features slightly more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better performance than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory. The Moto Z4 has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality images and videos and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Moto Z4 also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a bigger aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features better battery lifetime than Moto Z4, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z4. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold 2, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Moto Z4, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.