Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, getting a 94.6 score against 79.9. Both devices in our current comparison work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and OPPO Find X3 Pro were released only a couple months apart, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is thinner but heavier than OPPO Find X3 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit superior processor than OPPO Find X3 Pro. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch of screen and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3216.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger back camera sensor taking better quality photographs and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features as much storage capacity for applications and games as the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 one, both of them have equal 256 GB internal storage. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a battery life that's very similar to Galaxy Z Fold 2's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.