Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | TFT |
| 372 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the Galaxy A32, getting a 94.6 score against 84.7. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is a lot heavier but extremely thinner than Galaxy A32, and both of them were released only 4 months apart. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with Android 11 OS, while Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a brighter screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a bigger screen, a way higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a higher pixel amount per inch of screen. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a little better processing power than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A32 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more memory for games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has just a little better battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.