Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is better than the Galaxy A60, getting a score of 94.6 against 82.3. Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is heavier than Galaxy A60, it's thinner and newer. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 11 OS. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A60 features a display that is very similar to the screen in Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although the Samsung Galaxy A60 has a quite smaller screen and a lot lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixels density. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way worse 12 mega pixels resolution, a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features greater battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.