Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a bit better than the Galaxy A90 5G, with a 94.6 score against 90.5. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 works with Android 11 OS, and Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android OS. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a newer and somewhat thinner phone than Galaxy A90 5G, although it is way heavier.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a screen that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel amount in each display inch.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A90 5G's battery life is just as good as Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's battery duration.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light images, slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality photographs, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.