Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Galaxy C9 Pro, with a general score of 94.6 against 81. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an older 11 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a much heavier cellphone than Galaxy C9 Pro, but both of them are 0.27inches thick.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit higher display density, a higher 1768 x 2208 resolution and a larger screen.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a much lower 12 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.