Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s overall score of 79.3. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a heavier device than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, but they are 0.27inches thick. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a more recent 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version, giving you a lot of extra features and improved performance.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a quite superior processing power than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more cpu cores and 8 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a way better battery duration than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 50% more battery size. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a back-facing camera with a way lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture and a lot bigger camera sensor taking way better quality photographs and videos.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy S6 edge+, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S6 edge+. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy S6 edge+, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.