Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-09-19 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Blue, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than Xperia XZ1, having a overall score of 94.6 against 78.3. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is extremely heavier than the Xperia XZ1, it's just a little bit thinner and extremely newer. The Xperia XZ1 has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better screen density.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit faster processor than Xperia XZ1, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Xperia XZ1 feature very similar cameras, because although the Xperia XZ1 has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, a smaller aperture and a way smaller sensor capturing much worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same video quality, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 19 mega pixels resolution.
The Xperia XZ1 features more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a really longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ1, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 costs a lot more money than the Sony Xperia XZ1, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.