Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's global score of 85.5. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is notably newer and a lot thinner, but noticeably heavier than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2246px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same video frame rate and a back-facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger aperture and a lot larger sensor.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 256 GB. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Pocophone F1. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.