Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x |
| 2021-08-11 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is slightly better than iPhone SE (2022), getting a 90.6 score against 86.6. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is thinner but a lot heavier than the iPhone SE (2022), and both of them were released with only 7 months difference. Galaxy Z Fold 3 comes with Android 11 OS, and iPhone SE (2022) comes with iOS 15.x OS.
Apple iPhone SE (2022) features a little faster processor than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has lesser CPU cores (but faster) and 8 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. The iPhone SE (2022) features a little bit better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, although it has a way smaller display, a just a little worse amount of pixels per inch in the display and a much lower 750 x 1334 pixels resolution.
IPhone SE (2022) shoots greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the iPhone SE (2022) also has a larger camera aperture for better low-light captures. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.