Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is much better than Google Pixel 2's 81.6 general score. Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is newer and somewhat thinner than the Google Pixel 2's, but it is noticeably heavier. The Google Pixel 2 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixels density.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a little better performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 has a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back camera with a higher 12.2 mega pixels resolution and a bigger aperture. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.