Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the LG V30, with a general score of 90.6 against 79.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a notably newer and somewhat thinner device than LG V30, but it is also much heavier. The LG V30 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a higher pixels quantity per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a bit better performance than LG V30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory. LG V30 counts with a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features better battery duration than LG V30, because it has a 33% bigger battery capacity. LG V30 features a way better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a much bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.