Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-11 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a little bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ, getting a overall score of 90.6 against 83.7. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a notably newer and incredibly thinner phone than LG V50 ThinQ, but it's also notably heavier. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has newer 11 version and LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little bit better hardware performance than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a higher pixel density.
LG V50 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little longer battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 10% more battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ shoots way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a much bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.