Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than Motorola Edge 50, having a general score of 90.6 against 81.2. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version. Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a notably older and a lot heavier device than Motorola Edge 50, but Samsung made it thinner anyway.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a much better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher quantity of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Motorola Edge 50 has as much memory to install applications and games as Galaxy Z Fold 3, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and a much more megapixels back facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.