Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Galaxy S6 edge+, having a general score of 90.6 against 79.3. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has newer 11 version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is way newer and a little bit thinner, but also extremely heavier than the Galaxy S6 edge+.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a greater performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more processing cores. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a really smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot more MP camera in the back and a bigger camera aperture. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much better battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.