Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-11 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black, Green, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is better than Sony Xperia XZ2's 79.1 general score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is notably heavier than Sony Xperia XZ2, it's much thinner and way newer. The Sony Xperia XZ2 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lot smaller display and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a little higher pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a greater memory for applications and games than Xperia XZ2, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit better hardware performance than Sony Xperia XZ2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 has a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and video and a lot higher resolution camera in the back. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much longer battery life than Xperia XZ2, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.