Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-08-11 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 9.56 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. Even being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy Z Fold 3's design is way older, somewhat heavier and extremely thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the previous 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a quite greater pixels number per inch of screen and a little bigger display. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a really superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 256 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot bigger camera aperture for better photography in low light environments and a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has greater battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.