Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| -- | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| -- | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 8 inches |
| -- | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| -- | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6, with a 77.8 score against 73.9. Both of these phones come with the same Android 14 OS, so both should provide all the same OS features. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Z Fold 6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has more RAM.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Z Fold 6, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6, because it has 256 GB more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features improved battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 6, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.