Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2017-09-22 |
| -- | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.22 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| -- | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 326 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 is better than the Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), getting an 85 score against 74.8. The Apple iPhone 8 features a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a way smaller screen and much darker screen. IPhone 8 features as much memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) one, both of them have the same internal memory.
The Apple iPhone 8 has a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) features a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 8, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Apple iPhone 8 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a lot tinier sensor and a back-facing camera with a way worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, they both have the same camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.