Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| -- | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| -- | 456 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max is better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), with a general score of 84.5 against 74.8. The iPhone XS Max features a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has much less brightness and a bit smaller display. IPhone XS Max counts with a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a much tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors and a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, they both have the same diafragm aperture. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) has a very superior battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 38% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.