Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 15 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| -- | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| -- | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is better than the Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored)'s general score of 74.8. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version and Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) has Android 15 version. LG V50 ThinQ has a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller display.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ has a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) features just a little bit longer battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. LG V50 ThinQ takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has a much tinier camera sensor capturing lot lower quality videos and pictures and a lot worse 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.