Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-06-19 |
| -- | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.53 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is way better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), having a 91.8 score against 74.8. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) has Android 15 version. The Galaxy A71 5G has a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a lot better display than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a little smaller display. Galaxy A71 5G has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has a smaller sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, and they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.