Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| -- | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.09 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 514 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is better than the Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), getting a score of 87.1 against 74.8. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy Note9 has an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller screen.
The Galaxy Note9 has a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has a much tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors and a much lower 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy Note9 has a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) features a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 4400mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.