Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-29 |
| -- | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| Crafted Black, Navy, Pink, Silver Shadow and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| -- | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.57") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), having an 85.5 score against 74.8. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a way better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a bit smaller screen and much lower brightness.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), and although they both have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored) has a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 10 percent greater battery size.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 7 (Rumored), although it has a back camera with a much lower resolution, a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos in low-light environments and a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor giving a lot worse image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.