Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-08-03 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.25 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is much better than Asus ZenFone AR, having a score of 91.1 against 77.4. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a a lot thinner but heavier phone than Asus ZenFone AR. Asus ZenFone AR features an extremely better CPU than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 4 lesser cpu cores and 10 GB less RAM.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a better looking screen than Asus ZenFone AR, because although it has a way lower pixel amount per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better 1968 x 2184 resolution and a really larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a bit more storage for games and applications than Asus ZenFone AR, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has improved battery duration than Asus ZenFone AR, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition shoots slightly better photos and videos than Asus ZenFone AR, because it has a larger aperture for better photos and video in low light situations and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.