Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a score of 91.1, which is much better than Google Pixel 2's 81.6 overall score. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a noticeably heavier but incredibly thinner device than the Google Pixel 2. The Google Pixel 2 has a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a way bigger screen and a lot better resolution of 1968 x 2184. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition also has a camera with much more MP.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a way bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 2. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 2, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.