Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black Shadow | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a score of 91.1, which is much better than LG V20's global score of 77. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition design is much heavier but incredibly thinner than the LG V20. LG V20 features an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 4 less cores.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a more vivid display than LG V20, because although it has a much worse pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1968 x 2184px resolution and a much larger screen. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than LG V20, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much longer battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition also has a back camera with a way better 200 mega pixels resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V20. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get LG V20, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.