Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a global score of 91.1, which is a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's overall score of 83.7. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a extremely heavier but thinner phone than the LG V50 ThinQ. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has the newer 14 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version, providing you a couple nice extra features.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 10 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a bit sharper screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit lower 1968 x 2184 pixels resolution and a lot worse screen density, it also counts with a larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition shoots clearer photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has just a bit bigger storage for applications and games than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a bit longer battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 10% bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V50 ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V50 ThinQ, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.