Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is much better than Moto G Stylus, getting a overall score of 91.1 against 79.7. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a newer 14 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a somewhat heavier but noticeably thinner device than the Moto G Stylus.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a just a bit lower count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a higher 1968 x 2184 pixels resolution and a larger display. The Moto G Stylus has an extremely better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with just a little better battery duration than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 10% bigger battery size.
Motorola Moto G Stylus shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G Stylus. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.