Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is slightly better than Galaxy A80, getting a 91.1 score against 84.9. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition design is incredibly thinner but a bit heavier than the Galaxy A80. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit inferior pixel amount per inch in the display, it also counts with a better 1968 x 2184 resolution and a bigger screen.
Galaxy A80 features a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much greater memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition takes slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better captures and video in low light situations. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A80, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.