Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a score of 91.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy M31's 86.5 score. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's design is heavier but incredibly thinner than Galaxy M31. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has 14 version and Galaxy M31 has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a much faster CPU than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has a little bit inferior pixels count in each display inch, it also counts with a lot brighter display, a larger screen and a better 1968 x 2184 resolution.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M31, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M31 features a superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy M31 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a much worse 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.