Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, getting a score of 91.1 against 85.5. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's construction is extremely thinner but much heavier than Xiaomi Pocophone F1. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much better processing power than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a quite worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display, a better 1968 x 2184 resolution and a really brighter screen. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a larger aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited environments and a way better 200 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 10 percent more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Pocophone F1. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.