Compare phones
Samsung Gravity Q
SGH-T289Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 40.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 4.43 x 2.35 x 0.56 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.19 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 133 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| STE U6805-Core (Single-Core 416 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 128 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.39 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.84 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 0.5 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 360 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is way better than Samsung Gravity Q, getting a overall score of 80.7 against 40.8. The Galaxy Note 3 construction is extremely thinner but noticeably heavier than Samsung Gravity Q. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Gravity Q, because it has 2,88 GB more RAM, 7 more CPU cores and a GPU.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a much better display than Samsung Gravity Q, because it has a much larger screen, a much better 1920 x 1080 resolution and a lot greater screen density. Galaxy Note 3 features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Gravity Q, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 64 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a lot better camera than Samsung Gravity Q, because it has a back camera with way more megapixels. The Galaxy Note 3 has a way better battery performance than Samsung Gravity Q, because it has a 3200mAh battery size instead of 1000mAh.
Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.