Search


Compare phones

Global Score
38.539.5
Basic Information
SamsungSamsung
--2012-10-15
3.97 x 2.00 x 0.68 inches3.84 x 1.99 x 0.72 inches
3.52 ounces3.70 ounces
Red--
$ 65.00$ 65.00
Display / Screen
2.4 inches2.4 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTLCD
167 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.15.9
Performance
--Qualcomm QSC6155 chipset
Single-Core 416 MHz processor Single-Core 480 MHz processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
6.396.57
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
1.320
Camera
2.00 MP1.30 MP
4.734.51
GSM--
SIM--
0.10
Battery Life
800mAh Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
460 hours standby time
12 hours talk time
240 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
2.242.56
Other Features
--Bluetooth 3.0
--GPS

Comparison review

The Samsung M400 is a little bit better than Samsung GT-C3592, with a global score of 39.5 against 38.5. The Samsung M400 is a a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier phone than Samsung GT-C3592. Samsung GT-C3592 features a little bit better looking display than Samsung M400. They have the same screen pixels density, a display of the same size and the same resolution of 320 x 240 pixels.

The Samsung M400 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung GT-C3592. Both of them have a Single-Core processor. The Samsung GT-C3592 features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung M400, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 32 GB. Samsung GT-C3592 shoots a bit better videos and photos than Samsung M400, because it has a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.

Samsung M400 counts with greater battery life than Samsung GT-C3592, because it has a 1000mAh battery size.

The Samsung M400 costs exactly the same than the Samsung GT-C3592, making it a very good choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.