Compare phones
Samsung Star
GT-S5230| Global Score | |
| 35.1 | 38.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | 2009-03-10 |
| 3.99 x 1.86 x 0.56 inches | 4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches |
| 3.27 ounces | 3.25 ounces |
| $ 139.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2 inches | 3 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 240 x 400 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 102 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Resistive |
| 5.3 | 5.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 65,54 MB internal memory | 51,2 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 0.5 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 3.20 MP |
| -- | 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution |
| 3.63 | 5.39 |
| CDMA | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 350 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | 800 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 2.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Accelerometer |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Star is a little bit better than the Samsung Gusto, having a score of 38.4 against 35.1. Samsung Star's body is thinner and just a bit lighter than Samsung Gusto. The Samsung Gusto and the Samsung Star have quite similar processors, both of them have 0 processing cores. Samsung Star has a brighter display than Samsung Gusto, because it has a lot higher 400 x 240 resolution, a really bigger display and a way higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Star shoots a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Gusto, because it has a lot higher 3.2 MP resolution camera in the back. The Samsung Gusto features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Star, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Star's battery life is just as good as the battery life in Samsung Gusto.
Samsung Star not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.