Search


Compare phones

Samsung R220

SCH-R220

Samsung Star

GT-S5230
Global Score
3538.4
Basic Information
SamsungSamsung
--2009-03-10
3.86 x 2.01 x 0.77 inches4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches
2.86 ounces3.25 ounces
Gray and Red--
$ 299.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches3 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 400 pixels
TFTTFT
182 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
6.15.9
processor processor
512 MB RAM--
GPU GPU
5.855.76
Storage
1 GB internal memory51,2 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
1.40.4
Camera
1.30 MP3.20 MP
--320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
0.555.39
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.3
Battery Life
--1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
600 hours standby time
3.1 hours talk time
800 hours standby time
10 hours talk time
1.362.56
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.1
--Accelerometer
--FM Radio

Comparison review

The Samsung Star has an overall score of 38.4, which is just a bit better than the Samsung R220's 35 global score. The Samsung Star construction is a lot thinner but heavier than the Samsung R220. Samsung R220 has a little bit better looking display than Samsung Star, because although it has a little lower resolution of 320 x 240px and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels number per display inch.

The Samsung R220 has a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Star, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 972,8 MB more internal storage. Samsung R220 features a little better processing power than Samsung Star. Both of them have a 0-Core processor.

Samsung Star features a way better battery duration than Samsung R220. The Samsung Star captures a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung R220.

The Samsung Star not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.