Search


Compare phones

Global Score
36.439.3
Basic Information
SamsungMotorola
--Linux
2008-09-102007-05-15
4.50 x 2.10 x 0.70 inches4.05 x 2.08 x 0.46 inches
4.58 ounces4.12 ounces
$ 170.00$ 125.00
Display / Screen
2.1 inches2.2 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
134 pixels per inch182 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.76.2
processorARM II (Single-Core 500 MHz) processor
GPU GPU
5.766.57
Storage
32,77 MB internal memory2 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotNo SD card slot
0.41.9
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
--220 x 176 video resolution
4.734.84
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.3
Battery Life
960mAh Li-Ion Battery770mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
5.6 hours talk time280 hours standby time
8.3 hours talk time
2.482.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0
GPS--

Comparison review

The Motorola RAZR2 V8 is a bit better than the Samsung Rant, having a 39.3 score against 36.4. Even though Motorola RAZR2 V8 is older than the Samsung Rant, it's construction is thinner and lighter. The Motorola RAZR2 V8 features a faster CPU than Samsung Rant, because it has 1 more cores. The Motorola RAZR2 V8 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Rant, because it has a higher 320 x 240 resolution, a greater display pixel density and a bit larger screen.

The Motorola RAZR2 V8 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Rant, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola RAZR2 V8 captures clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Rant. They have a camera with a 2 mega pixels resolution.

The Samsung Rant counts with better battery performance than Motorola RAZR2 V8, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.

The Motorola RAZR2 V8 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.