Search


Compare phones

Global Score
38.941.6
Basic Information
SamsungSamsung
--bada 1.1
--2010-06-14
4.29 x 2.17 x 0.65 inches4.31 x 2.17 x 0.47 inches
4.94 ounces3.53 ounces
--Black, Pink and White
$ 110.00$ 75.00
Display / Screen
3.1 inches3.2 inches
480 x 800 pixels 240 x 400 pixels
AMOLEDTFT
301 pixels per inch146 pixels per inch
ResistiveCapacitive, Multi-touch
7.16.3
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--102,4 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
11.6
Camera
3.00 MP3.20 MP
--320 x 240 (QVGA) video resolution
5.065.17
Networks
--Wi-Fi
EV-DO A and CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.22.7
Battery Life
960mAh Li-Ion Battery1200mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
300 hours standby time
4.7 hours talk time
923 hours standby time
14.6 hours talk time
2.482.88
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1Bluetooth 3.0
GPSGPS
AccelerometerAccelerometer and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The Samsung Wave 525 has a general score of 41.6, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Rogue's overall score of 38.9. Samsung Wave 525 is a a lot thinner and extremely lighter device than the Samsung Rogue. The Samsung Rogue counts with a better looking display than Samsung Wave 525, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 800 x 480px resolution and a way better display density.

The Samsung Wave 525 features a processor that's just as good as Samsung Rogue's processing unit, they have a 0-Core processing unit. The Samsung Wave 525 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Rogue, because it has a camera with a better 3.2 MP resolution. The Samsung Wave 525 has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Rogue. Both of them have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 16 GB.

Samsung Wave 525 counts with improved battery lifetime than Samsung Rogue, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.

Samsung Wave 525 is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.