Compare phones
Samsung SCH-A790
SCH-A795, SPH-A790, IP-A790| Global Score | |
| 30 | 27.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Cricket |
| -- | 2009-09-22 |
| 3.40 x 2.00 x 1.00 inches | 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches |
| 4.20 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.1 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 10,24 MB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 3.63 | 3.63 |
| GSM and CDMA | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 920mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 141 hours standby time 2.9 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung SCH-A790 is a little bit better than the Cricket CAPTR, having a 30 score against 27.9. Despite being the best we compare here, Samsung SCH-A790 is a thicker and much heavier cellphone than Cricket CAPTR. Samsung SCH-A790 and Cricket CAPTR both feature very similar CPUs, both of them have 0 processing cores.
The Cricket CAPTR has a lot better looking display than Samsung SCH-A790, although it has a much lower resolution of 160 x 128 pixels. The Samsung SCH-A790 features a much greater storage for games and applications than Cricket CAPTR. Cricket CAPTR counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung SCH-A790.
The Samsung SCH-A790 and the Cricket CAPTR both count with really similar cameras, both have a 0.3 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung SCH-A790 costs exactly the same than the Cricket CAPTR, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.