Search


Compare phones

Samsung SCH-A790

SCH-A795, SPH-A790, IP-A790
Global Score
3027.9
Basic Information
SamsungCricket
--2009-09-22
3.40 x 2.00 x 1.00 inches3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches
4.20 ounces2.82 ounces
$ 40.00$ 40.00
Display / Screen
--1.8 inches
176 x 220 pixels 128 x 160 pixels
TFTTFT
--114 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.15.4
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
10,24 MB internal memory--
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
0.20
Camera
0.30 MP0.30 MP
3.633.63
GSM and CDMACDMA
SIM--
0.20.1
Battery Life
Li-Ion Battery920mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
141 hours standby time
2.9 hours talk time
250 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
1.362.48
Other Features
--Bluetooth
GPS--

Comparison review

The Samsung SCH-A790 is a little bit better than the Cricket CAPTR, having a 30 score against 27.9. Despite being the best we compare here, Samsung SCH-A790 is a thicker and much heavier cellphone than Cricket CAPTR. Samsung SCH-A790 and Cricket CAPTR both feature very similar CPUs, both of them have 0 processing cores.

The Cricket CAPTR has a lot better looking display than Samsung SCH-A790, although it has a much lower resolution of 160 x 128 pixels. The Samsung SCH-A790 features a much greater storage for games and applications than Cricket CAPTR. Cricket CAPTR counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung SCH-A790.

The Samsung SCH-A790 and the Cricket CAPTR both count with really similar cameras, both have a 0.3 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.

The Samsung SCH-A790 costs exactly the same than the Cricket CAPTR, which makes it an easy decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.