Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 30.1 | 27.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Cricket |
| Symbian | -- |
| -- | 2009-09-22 |
| 3.50 x 1.93 x 0.91 inches | 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 176 x 208 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| SD, MMC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 3.63 | 3.63 |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Battery | 920mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung SGH-D700 has a score of 30.1, which is just a bit better than the Cricket CAPTR's global score of 27.9. Samsung SGH-D700 is a thicker and way heavier phone than Cricket CAPTR. Cricket CAPTR's processing unit is just as good as the processing unit in Samsung SGH-D700, they have 0 cpu cores.
The Cricket CAPTR has a much better screen than Samsung SGH-D700, although it has a much lower 160 x 128 resolution. The Samsung SGH-D700 and the Cricket CAPTR both count with very similar storage for games and applications, although the Cricket CAPTR has no slot for an SD memory card. Cricket CAPTR has superior battery duration than Samsung SGH-D700, because it has a 15% larger battery size.
The Samsung SGH-D700 and the Cricket CAPTR count with incredibly similar cameras, both have a 0.3 megapixels back facing camera.
The Samsung SGH-D700 and the Cricket CAPTR cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.