Compare phones
Samsung Star
GT-S5230| Global Score | |
| 35.6 | 38.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | 2009-03-10 |
| 3.81 x 1.96 x 1.10 inches | 4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches |
| 4.40 ounces | 3.25 ounces |
| $ 90.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 3 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 400 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 154 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Resistive |
| 5.9 | 5.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 20,48 MB internal memory | 51,2 MB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 3.20 MP |
| -- | 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution |
| 4.51 | 5.39 |
| UMTS, GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 2 hours talk time | 800 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.1 |
| -- | Accelerometer |
| -- | FM Radio |
| Digital TV Broadcast | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Star is slightly better than Samsung SGH-P920, getting a general score of 38.4 against 35.6. Samsung Star is a a lot lighter and extremely thinner phone than Samsung SGH-P920. Samsung Star counts with a screen that is very similar to the screen in Samsung SGH-P920, although the Samsung Star also has a slightly higher 400 x 240px resolution and a quite greater pixels density.
Samsung Star counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung SGH-P920, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 30,72 MB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Star has a processor that is just as good as the Samsung SGH-P920 one, both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung SGH-P920 and the Samsung Star both feature quite similar battery performance. The Samsung Star shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung SGH-P920, because it has a camera in the back with a lot higher 3.2 mega pixels resolution.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Star is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.