Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 33.2 | 35.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Palm |
| -- | webOS |
| -- | 2009-09-09 |
| 3.74 x 1.89 x 0.72 inches | 4.37 x 2.17 x 0.43 inches |
| 2.98 ounces | 3.51 ounces |
| $ 135.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.6 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 320 x 400 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 60 pixels per inch | 197 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 4.5 | 6.8 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 10,24 MB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 3.3 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 3.63 | 4.73 |
| GPRS and GSM | EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1150mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | 350 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Palm Pixi is a little bit better than Samsung SGH-T139, getting a general score of 35.8 against 33.2. Palm Pixi's construction is somewhat heavier but noticeably thinner than Samsung SGH-T139. Palm Pixi's CPU is just as good as the CPU in Samsung SGH-T139, although the Palm Pixi also has 1 more megahertz cores.
Palm Pixi features a way better looking display than Samsung SGH-T139, because it has a much higher 400 x 320 resolution and a much higher display pixels density. The Palm Pixi takes greater pictures and videos than Samsung SGH-T139, because it has a back camera with a lot better resolution. The Palm Pixi counts with much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung SGH-T139, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Palm Pixi counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung SGH-T139, because it has a 44% larger battery size.
The Palm Pixi not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.